Subscribe to our RSS Feed

နိုဘယ္ဆုေပးပြဲတြင္ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ ၁ နာရီ ေက်ာ္ ၾကာေအာင္ မိန္႔ခြန္း ေျပာၾကားခဲ့ေသာ္လည္း ဘာေတြလုပ္ခဲ့လို႔ နိုဘယ္ဆု ရခဲ့တယ္ဆိုတဲ့ အေၾကာင္း လံုးဝ မပါ

Sunday, June 17, 2012  ME  21 comments


မေန႔က ေနာ္ေဝနုိင္ငံမွာ က်င္းပတဲ့ ထူးထူးဆန္းဆန္း အခ်ိန္အခါမဟုတ္ ဖန္တီးေရြးခ်ယ္ေပးတဲ့ နိုဘယ္ဆုေပး မွာ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ က မိန္႔ခြန္းေျပာၾကားခဲ့ပါတယ္။ နိုဘယ္ဆုေပးပြဲမွာ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ မွ ၁ နာရီ ေက်ာ္ ၾကာေအာင္ မိန္႔ခြန္း ေျပာၾကားခဲ့ေသာ္လည္း သူမ အေနနဲ႔ ျမန္မာ နုိင္ငံနဲ႔ ျမန္မာ တုိင္းရင္းသား ျပည္သူတို႔အတြက္ ဘာေတြလုပ္ခဲ့လို႔ နိုဘယ္ဆု ရခဲ့တယ္ဆိုတဲ့ အေၾကာင္း လံုးဝ မပါ ဘူးလို႔ သိရပါတယ္။

မိန္႔ခြန္းအစမွာ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ဟာ သူမရဲ႕ သားျဖစ္သူ ျမန္မာစကားမေျပာတတ္တဲ့ အလက္ဇႏၵားနဲ႔ ျမန္မာနုိင္ငံကို ပစ္ထားကာ နုိင္ငံျခားမွာေနတုန္း ေရဒီယုိ နားေထာင္တဲ့အေၾကာင္း ကို အစခ်ီေျပာထားပါတယ္။ အဲဒီေနာက္ ၁၉၈၉ တုန္းက သူမရဲ႕ ခ်စ္လွစြာေသာ လင္ေယာက်ၤား ျဖစ္ေသူ ၿဗိတိန္နုိင္ငံသား မုိက္ကယ္အဲရစ္က ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ကို နိုဘယ္ဆု မျဖစ္မေန ေပးဖို႔ သြားေျပာတဲ့ အေၾကာင္း ကို ထည့္သြင္းေျပာၾကားသြားပါတယ္။

မိုက္ကယ္အဲရစ္က ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရး နုိဘယ္ဆု ကို ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကား အားေပးဖို႔ ေျပာၿပီး ခ်ိန္မွ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္က ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးရဲ႕ အဓိပၸါယ္ကို ျပန္လည္သံုးသပ္ဖို႔ အသင့္ေတာ္ဆံုး အခ်ိန္လို႔ ထင္ျမင္တဲ့အခ်ိန္ ျဖစ္ေနတယ္လို႔ ေျပာပါတယ္။ ဒါ့အျပင္ နိုဘယ္ဆု ရေၾကာင္း ေၾကညာ ခ်ိန္မွာလည္း ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္အေနနဲ႔ သိပ္ၿပီး မခံစားရေၾကာင္း သူမကိုယ္သူမလည္း အေျခအေန ကို သိေၾကာင္း၊ သူမကိုယ္တုိင္က သိပ္ျပီး လက္ေတြ႔မဆန္ ပဲ စိတ္ကူးသာ ရွိေနေၾကာင္း ေျပာခဲ့ပါတယ္။

အဲဒီေနာက္မွာ ေတာ့ ေထြရာေလးပါးေတြကို တစ္နာရီ ေက်ာ္ေအာင္ေျပာၿပီး နိဂံုးခ်ဳပ္သြားပါတယ္။ မိန္႔ခြန္း အတြင္းမွာ မိုက္ကယ္အဲရစ္၊ အလက္ဇႏၵားအဲရစ္ ဆိုတဲ့ နာမည္မ်ားကို သာ ထုတ္ေဖာ္ ေျပာၾကားသြားၿပီး ဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္ေအာင္ဆန္း ဆိုတဲ့ စကားလံုးကိုေတာ့ လံုးဝ ထည့္သြင္းေျပာၾကားသြားျခင္း မရွိဘူးလို႔ သိရပါတယ္။

အေရွ႕ေတာင္ အာရွ တြင္ နိုဘယ္ဆု ရရွိသူ အနည္းအက်ဥ္း သာရွိၿပီး အမ်ားစု မွာ ဆုေပးေသာ္လည္း ၎ တို႔အေနျဖင့္ ဘာမွ ေျပာင္ေျပာင္ေျမာက္ေျမာက္ လုပ္မၿပီးေသးတာေၾကာင့္ ဆု ႏွင့္ မထိုက္တန္ ဟု ေျပာဆိုကာ ဆုယူဖို႔ ျငင္းခဲ့ၾကပါတယ္။ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ကေတာ့ စာအုပ္ေတြ ပို႔ၿပီး ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးနိုဘယ္ဆု ကို ၿပံဳးၿပံဳးႀကီး ယူခဲ့ပါတယ္။

Myanmar Express

Posted in: ,

21 comments:

ၾကက္သတုံးမ........

ဘယ္လိုလုပ္သိမတုန္းဗ်... သူကိုယ္တိုင္ေတာင္ ဘာလုပ္လို႕လုပ္မွန္းသိေကာသိရဲ့လားေမးၾကည့္ပါဦး။ ဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္ေအာင္ဆန္းနာမည္မေျပာရဲဘူးေလ.. သူ႕ကိုအေမြေတာင္ေပးခဲ့တာဟုတ္ဘူး... အဲရစ္ကသာ သားနွစ္ေယာက္ေပးခဲ့တာေလဗ်... ဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္သိရင္လဲ လက္ပိုက္ၾကည့္ေနမွာမဟုတ္ဘူး။ အိမ္ဦးခန္းမွာထူးတဲ့ ဓားရွည္ၾကီးနဲ့ ေျပးခုတ္မွာ ေသခ်ာတယ္ဗ်။

BURMA..BURMESE BURMA..BURMESE BURMA..BURMESE

ျမန္မာဟူေသာ စကားလံုးကိုေတာ့ လံုးဝ ထည့္သြင္းေျပာၾကားသြားျခင္း မရွိ။

ဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္ေအာင္ဆန္း ဆိုတဲ့ စကားလံုးကိုေတာ့ လံုးဝ ထည့္သြင္းေျပာၾကားသြားျခင္း မရွိဘူး.. တျခားျမန္မာနံမည္ေတြလည္း
တစ္ခုမွမပါဘူး.. ကုလားျဖဴနံမည္ေတြပဲေတြ့တယ္။ ျမန္မာ့သမိုင္းလည္းမပါဘူး..ဒါေၾကာင့္ ငါမွတ္ခ်က္ေပးလိုတာက
သူမကို ေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ (ခ) Mrs Eris လို့ေခၚၾကေစခ်င္တယ္..(စာလံုးေပါင္းမွားႏိုင္တယ္)။

မ ႏၱ ေလး နန္း ေတာ္ ၾကီး ကို ဗုံး ၾကဲ သြား တာ ကု လား ျဖဴ ေလ ၊သူ က ကု လား ျဖဴ ထဲ က သား ႏွစ္ ေကာင္ အ ေမြ ရ ထား ေတာ႔ ေဖၚ ေျပာ ရ တာ ေပါ႔

I watched on TV (CNN) from the beginning to the end, in her Nobel speech she never called Myanmar, just called Burma and Burmese, she said: thank you to Norwegian Nobel Peace Prize Committe, Norwegian King, Queen, Norwegian people and audiences, she never say thanks to President U thein Sein, actually she could stand on the stage in front of all audiences because of President U Thein Sein gave her a favorable conditions of chances she could never being expected, example: NLD got a chance to register, she could run the Election, she became a Member of the Parliament and finally she could stand up and gave a Nobel speech, she must say "I could have all these advantageous opportunities because of our President U Thein Sein and I appreciate and thank you President U Thein Sein" how's good if she said like that, but now................

Pre-emptive nobel prize....ႀကဳိတင္လက္ဦးမႈယူ ႏုိဘယ္ဆု ေပးျခင္း ျဖစ္ပါတယ္ခင္ဗ်ား။ Prize ဆုိသည္မွာ a thing given as a reward to a winner or in recognition of an outstanding achievement... ေအာင္ႏုိင္သူတစ္ဦးသုိ႔ သုိ႔မဟုတ္ ထူးျခားေျပာင္ေျမာက္စြာျဖင့္ တစ္စုံတစ္ရာအား ေအာင္ျမင္ၿပီးေျမာက္ေအာင္ ႀကိဳးစားအားထုတ္ေဆာင္ရြက္ ႏုိင္မႈကုိ ဂုဏ္ျပဳသည့္အေနျဖင့္ ဆုလဒ္ အျဖစ္ေပးေသာအရာ လုိ႔ အဘိဓာန္မွာ ဖြင့္ဆုိထားပါတယ္။ အဲဒါ လက္ေတြ႔နဲ႔ ကုိက္မကုိက္ ၾကည္႔ၾကပါ။

We all Myanmar totally agreed with Timothy.

She can't do nothing for Myanmar people. She must do only for herself. She never thought for our country(Myanmar). She always think about for herself. Her mother is serious illness in 1988 , so she came back to Yangon, not for democracy. Nobel prize committee didn't know that matter. Unbelievable.. Crazy Nobel prize committee.. finally she received the peace Nobel prize. SHY ON YOU... AUNG SAN SU KYI..

She didnt say anything because she had nothing to say. Because she had done nothing special to her nation. Just watch and learn the rakhine affairs, she never stands by the side of her nation but please islam people as you see in the news or photos. Also as we know people always talk abt her as our nation leader but the real leader should be protect her own nation no matter what. She never do anything like that and she will never be our true leader. If we vote for her, she will sell our country to her british partners. She's not the leader, she's the liason with the her husband's peoples but never with myanmar. Everybody should see the truth.

I accept Bogyoke Aung Sann as our nation leader and giver of our freedom.. But that old hag daw su is not our leader, i never fellow her words,thoughts or opinions because these are meaningless and also never had an action plan.. I dont want that old stupid british servant hag to be our leader.. I'll do anything I can to stop her from engulfing our country with her fellow british and western partners.She wanna give all of our mineral resources to her husband's country. we must now our duty to stop that kind of purposes.

ၿမန္မာ့ သမိုင္းကို ဘယ္ေၿပာရဲမလဲ .. သူ့လင္ လူမ်ိဳးေတြက ၿမန္မာ နိုင္ငံအေပၚမွာ ကြ်န္ၿပဳသြားၾကတာ ဆိုေတာ့ အဟင့္ အဟင့္.. သူမေၿပာရဲဘူးေပါ့

Aw..... Ma shi tar htet,ma thi tar khat so tar dar myo ko.Thi gyin yaung saung tar po khat ohn mai.

ဓါတ္ပုံေတြၾကည့္လို႔မရဘူးဗ်ာ။

ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံအေပၚ ေစတနာထားေသာ အေမရိကန္လူမ်ိဳမ်ား ႏွင့္ ေစတနာမရွိေသာ ျမန္မာလူမ်ဳိးတစ္ဦးတုိ႔၏ သေဘာထားအျမင္မ်ားကုိ ထင္ဟပ္ေဖၚျပေသာ သတင္း(၂)ပုဒ္(၁)
Lift U.S. sanctions during FM’s U.S. visit: Webb
Wednesday, 16 May 2012 15:38 Mizzima News
(MIzzima) – The arrival of the Burmese foreign minister to visit Washington this week is an “appropriate” time to lift U.S. sanctions, Sen. Jim Webb said on Tuesday.
Foreign Minister Wunna Maung Lwin will arrive in Washington this week to meet with senior leaders, including Webb.
“The president has the power to lift economic sanctions,” said Webb, who is chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations East Asian and Pacific Affairs Subcommittee. “It is time for him to act.”
In 2009, Webb was the first American leader to visit Burma in more than 10 years, and he remains the only American official ever to meet with General Than Shwe, the former leader of the military junta. “The U.S. trade embargo with China was lifted 41 years ago, on the gamble that political reforms would follow economic change," said Webb. “Burma has taken the unusual step of making political advances ahead of economic change. The process of reform in Burma is still far from complete, but the positive steps that have been taken should be met with a positive response from our own government.”
The senator warned against lifting sanctions sector by sector, saying that retaining sanctions on individual industries such as petroleum would be “a strategic mistake.”

ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံအေပၚ ေစတနာထားေသာ အေမရိကန္လူမ်ိဳမ်ား ႏွင့္ ေစတနာမရွိေသာ ျမန္မာလူမ်ဳိးတစ္ဦးတုိ႔၏ သေဘာထားအျမင္မ်ားကုိ ထင္ဟပ္ေဖၚျပေသာ သတင္း(၂)ပုဒ္(၂)
New York Times: Myanmar dissident cautions prospective investors
Thomas Fuller
Fri 1 Jun 2012
Filed under: Business / Trade,International
BANGKOK — Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, the Nobel peace laureate and leader of Myanmar’s democracy movement, stared down into an audience of corporate executives here on Friday and issued a blistering assessment of her country’s judicial system. “Would-be investors in Burma, please be warned,” she said, referring to the country by its former name. “Even the best investment laws would be of no use whatsoever if there are no courts that are clean enough and independent enough to be able to administer those laws justly. This is our problem: So far we have not been aware of any reforms on the judicial front.”
Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi’s speech to the business audience here came during her first trip outside her country in 24 years, many of them spent under house arrest. She did not sugarcoat her message.
She told the executives and bankers in the audience, many of whom do business with Myanmar or plan to invest there, that her country’s educational system was a shambles, that youth unemployment was a “time bomb” and that Myanmar is not a “genuinely democratic society.”
“I would not like you to be overoptimistic,” she said. “These days I’m coming across a lot of what I would call reckless optimism.” She said many young people in Myanmar had lost their way and were drinking, taking drugs and gambling. “If this goes on, we will not be able to reform them, let alone our own country,” she said.
As a dissident who was detained at her home for 15 years by Myanmar’s military, Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi was known for her defiance of the military, stubbornness and strong will. Now a member of Parliament, elected under a new civilian government’s fledgling political reforms, she did not modulate from that tone at the conference on Friday, which was put on by the World Economic Forum, the group that also hosts the annual gathering in Davos, Switzerland.
But by cautioning investors at a time when the impoverished country is courting them, some in the audience thought that Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi had gone too far.
“I thought she was excessively pessimistic,” said Joseph E. Stiglitz, a professor of economics at Columbia University in New York who has helped advise the Myanmar government during its transition from military dictatorship.
Mr. Stiglitz said that despite “uncertainties” and a weak judicial system, foreign investors could expect good returns. He compared Myanmar to China. The rule of law is very weak in China yet the country has grown at an impressive pace for the last three decades and foreign investors have profited, he said.
In Myanmar, “there is a commitment on the part of the current government to try to attract investment,” Professor Stiglitz said. “That commitment implies it will be sensitive to the concerns of investors.”

ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံအေပၚ ေစတနာထားေသာ အေမရိကန္လူမ်ဳိးမ်ားႏွင့္ ေစတနာမရွိေသာ ျမန္မာလူမ်ိဳးတစ္ဦး တုိ႔၏ သေဘာထားအျမင္မ်ားကုိ ထင္ဟပ္ေဖၚျပေသာ သတင္း(၂)ပုဒ္(၃)
Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi said she did not want to discourage investment. She spoke of a healthy skepticism. “I think you should see it as a word of caution, a strong word of caution,” she told reporters.
Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi arrived in Thailand on Monday, the first time she had traveled outside Myanmar in 24 years.
Her message of caution contrasted with a presentation at the same conference by U Than Htay, Myanmar’s minister of energy, a speech that received much less prominent billing. “The new government is encouraging foreign investors to invest in wide-ranging industries,” Mr. Than Htay said.
Mr. Than Htay spoke in place of Myanmar’s president, Thein Sein, who was to have attended but canceled at the last minute. His visit to Thailand had been rescheduled for next week but that was also canceled, the Thai Foreign Ministry said Friday.
Mr. Than Htay’s speech was a classic pitch to potential investors and contrasted sharply with Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi’s remarks. The government is “making important strides” in education policies, he said.
Mr. Than Htay spoke about the country’s tourism potential, its vast jungles and mountains for “adventure-seeking sport enthusiasts.” He touted several special economic zones that the government had approved for foreign investors.
Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi, by contrast, said the zones were being created without any transparency. Specifically addressing an economic zone near the border with Thailand, she said, “We, the people of Burma, were kept completely in the dark about what was in the contracts, about what was going on.
“This is very dangerous for a country,” she said. “It endangers national reconciliation. It engenders more and more suspicion and mistrust.”
One of the executives who heard Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi’s remarks on Friday was Stuart Dean, the chief executive officer of General Electric Asean, the Southeast Asian branch of the American company. Mr. Dean acknowledged that there were risks in investing in Myanmar but said that the country could not pass up the opportunity. “Our view is that you’ve got to look at the risk of going into an emerging market like Myanmar,” he said in an interview. “But at the same you’ve also got to look at the risk of not going into the country.”
Last month, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton announced that the United States was suspending restrictions on investment by American companies in Myanmar.
Myanmar government officials visited the Washington offices of General Electric on Wednesday and asked the company to help devise an energy policy, Mr. Dean said. General Electric plans to open an office in the country later this year.
Mr. Dean said there were limits to talking about the risks of investing in Myanmar. “They need electricity,” he said. “I can’t imagine that we ship some turbines there and they don’t pay us for them. Who else is going to ship turbines once that story gets out?”
General Electric’s dealings with the government so far were very positive, he said. “It’s early days. But it appears to be an easy place to do business,” he said. “I’m sure it won’t always be like that. But right now it’s pretty good.”

ဘာေတြလုပ္ခဲ့လုိ႔ ႏုိဘယ္ဆုရခဲ့တယ္ ဆုိတဲ့အေၾကာင္း လုံး၀မပါေပမဲ့ ႏုိဘယ္ဆုရခဲ့တဲ့အတြက္ (၁)က်မ အထီးက်န္ဘ၀က လြတ္ေျမာက္ၿပီး ကမၻာေက်ာ္သြားေစခဲ့တယ္၊ (၂)ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံအေရး မေကာင္းေၾကာင္းေတြကုိ ကမၻာကုိမီးေမာင္းထုိးျပၿပီး ဖိအားေပး ႏုိင္ခဲ့တယ္လုိ႔ ပါပါတယ္ဗ်ာ။

ရင္းႏွီးျမွဳပ္နွံမည့္သူေတြ ျမန္မာနုိင္ငံအေပၚ သိပ္အထင္မႀကီးၾကပါနဲ႔၊ အေကာင္းသိပ္မျမင္ပါနဲ႔၊ ဘာျဖစ္လုိ႔လဲဆုိေတာ့ ႏုိင္ငံျခားသားေတြ ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံကုိ မ်က္ေစ့စုံမွိတ္ယုံစားတာမ်ိဳး blind faith ကုိ က်မအားမေပးဘူး။ ျမန္မာလူမ်ဳိး က်မကသာ ႏုိင္ငံျခားသား အဂၤလိပ္ကုိ blind faith တင္မကဘူး၊ တကုိယ္လုံး ပုံအပ္ခြင့္ရွိပါတယ္--- လုိ႔လဲပါပါေသးတယ္ဗ်ာ။

ဗုဒၵဘုရားေဟာၾကားခဲ့တဲ့ ဒုကၡ (၆)မ်ဳိး [6 dukhas] အနက္ က်မအတြက္ ခ်စ္တဲ့သူ Michael Aris နဲ႔ ေကြကြင္းရျခင္း ဆုိတဲ့ဒုကၡ [to be parted from Michael I love]နဲ႔ မခ်စ္မႏွစ္သက္တဲ့ တပ္ျပဳတ္၊အရပ္ျပဳပ္၊ကြန္ျမဴနစ္ထြက္ အဘုိးႀကီးေတြနဲ႔ အတူဆက္ဆံေနရျခင္း [to be forced to live in propinquity with the oldies I don't love] ဆုိတဲ့ဒုကၡ (၂)မ်ဳိးကေတာ့ အခံစားရဆုံးပါဘဲရွင္......လုိ႔လည္းေျပာသြားပါတယ္ခင္ဗ်ာ။

အဲဒီေသာက္ေကာင္မကျငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးနိုဘယ္ဆုဘယ္လုိရ သြားလဲမသိၾကဘူးမဟုတ္လား။ျမန္မာျပည္မွမေကာင္း ေၾကာင္း၊အစိုးရမေကာင္းေၾကာင္းေတြေျပာျပီးနိုင္ငံမျငိမ္မ သက္ျဖစ္ေအာင္မျငိမ္းခ်မ္းေအာင္လုပ္အတိုက္အခံလုပ္လို ့ သူ ့လင္ေတြကဖာသည္မစုၾကည္အာေညာင္းေလကုန္ခံခ မုန္ ့ဘိုးေပးလုိက္တာ။

Post a Comment

https://www.facebook.com/MyanmarExpress တြင္ သတင္းမ်ား ဆက္လက္ဖတ္ရႈရန္